Got it!
We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. More info

Already a subscriber or advertiser? Enter your login information here

Friday, 30 October 2020

FREE! Sign up for the TIE newsletter and never miss out on international school news, headlines, resources and best-practices from around the world!

28 October 2020 | TIE Is Transitioning Too
15 October 2020 | Rising to the Challenge
30 September 2020 | Yes We Can MUN!
16 September 2020 | A Year of Recovery
03 September 2020 | Challenge Accepted
21 July 2020 | TIE Statement on Equity
19 June 2020 | Juneteenth & the June Issue
04 June 2020 | Black Lives Matter
22 May 2020 | Every Voice Counts
23 April 2020 | Believe in Books

  Enter your email below to sign up:

Ready to subscribe and get all the features TIE has to offer? Click here >>


You are here: Home > Online Articles > Strange Bedfellows: When "Race" Isn't Always About Race



Strange Bedfellows: When "Race" Isn't Always About Race

Growing Up in Transit

By Danau Tanu

Strange Bedfellows: When

Global citizenship is in bed with colorblind racism. If you’ve lived online this COVID summer (or winter, if you’re down under), as most of us have, and if you’ve followed the social media hashtags #intELOC or #decoloniseib, you may have heard some version of that statement by now. But how does colorblind racism playout in international schools, exactly? Besides, why is it racist to claim to not see color?

Let’s break it down.

This is the first in a series of articles that I will write to detail how structural racism works in the international school setting. I will mainly draw on the doctoral research that I conducted on this topic.

Some years ago, at 30-something, I went back to high school for a full year to collect data via participant observation and in-depth interviews. I chose an international school in Indonesia that boasts of having a wide range of nationalities represented among students and staff. Overt racism is not condoned. If a student ever says anything racist, their classmates would call them out before the teachers could. It seemed like a picture-perfect international school.

Yet, students learn to internalise cultural hierarchies, meaning that student perceptions of popularity are sometimes colored by race.

The popularity stakes

“So, who are the popular kids?” I asked a couple of seniors.

“Well, popularity isn't such a big deal here, but I suppose the white kids that like to sit over there are considered popular,” Melinda answered as she pointed at the benches near the high school office.

“The white kids?” I repeated suspiciously, as I was sure they were not all “white.”

“Yeah, the white kids.”

I leaned over to do a double take on the group she was referring to. Many of them were Caucasian but there were also two who were Black, one who was South Asian, and at least three were of mixed Caucasian and Asian descent. Melinda did not notice the irony in her choice of words.

On another occasion, a couple of students from the group referred to as the “white kids” helped some Korean students set up a tent for an event. All were male. One of their friends came over and said, “Hey, the white kids are helping the Korean kids!” There was a pause as we all tried to digest that statement. One of the “white kids” broke the silence: “Dude, I'm Pakistani.” The other “white kid” added, as he held on to the tent he was working on, “Yeah and I'm Asian. My mom is Chinese… and you're half Japanese.” It was only then that the student realized the inaccuracy of his statement.

What these kids understand is that whiteness is not always about skin color. It can also be about looking and sounding as though you have been raised in a white-dominant society. The student cliques perceived to be popular often have more Caucasian students than other groups. But they also have non-Caucasian members, who are usually highly westernized native speakers of English. The way they sit, walk, talk, move, dress and wear makeup all betray the western influences in their lives. As a result of their shared culture, they are often perceived to be “white” and popular, both among themselves and by others.

School culture

The school administration affirms the dominant position of students socialized in Anglophone culture in subtle and not so subtle ways. The curriculum focuses on the West, with a particular emphasis on the U.S. and the U.K. For the sports on offer as extracurricular activities, for example, much more attention is paid to sports like rugby and softball than to sports popular among the Asian students, who make up a majority of the school population, such as badminton or martial arts.

A shared culture also makes it easier for students from western countries to build rapport with the mostly white, Anglophone teachers and administrators. Japanese students are generally silent in the regular classes taught by teachers from Anglophone countries, but become vocal and participative once they are in a class with a Japanese teacher. An Indonesian teacher also commented that her Indonesian students were more relaxed in her class.

Fighting back

Just as native English speakers are perceived as white regardless of how they look, Indonesian-speaking students at the school—a group that includes Indonesian nationals of different ethnic backgrounds, including those of Chinese, Indian, and Arab descent, and students of mixed heritage, as well as Koreans, Taiwanese, Filipinos and a Palestinian, among others—are perceived as being homogeneously Indonesian. Some of these students don’t even speak much Indonesian.

One of them, Andrew, has an Indonesian mother. His father comes from the United Kingdom, but Andrew considers himself more Indonesian than British.

“Here in Indonesia, I can make conversation with anyone I see. From Bali to wherever I go, upper class to lower class, even pedicab drivers and beggars,” he said, gesturing with his hand as he spoke. “But then when I go to England, it's a different story. I don't really know what to talk about.” Speaking of the “white” students, he says, “When I hang out with them, I just don't feel that connection.”

For the most part, the “Indonesian” students like Andrew get along well with foreign students. But they sometimes choose to describe their relationship with “white” students in nationalistic, anti-colonialist terms. He described the “white” students as “arrogant,” asserting that “They walk around like they own the place. So we put them in their place.”

As Andrew's comments suggest, the dominant position occupied by the popular “white” group doesn't go unchallenged. Indonesian students are generally from privileged backgrounds and don't shy from using their financial resources to vie for the top place in the school’s social hierarchy—something that drew the ire of other students and teachers. Indonesian students counter the advantages enjoyed by foreign students by making a show of their wealth, for example, chipping in together to hire a posh Jakarta club (and some bodyguards) for a party. One student revealed that the actual cost of these kinds of functions is less than the other students think. But they leave others second guessing the cost in order to play up their financial capacity.


Teachers and administrators, as well as other students, like to point out that the “Indonesians” tend not to mix, something that has a bearing on their standing in the eyes of staff, for whom the ideal student is the “global citizen.” Indonesians add to the school's overall sense of diversity by their presence but fall short on being “international” due to their failure to assimilate into the school culture. By contrast, English-speaking groups are perceived by staff to be the most international because of the mix of race—in the colonial sense of the word, that is—represented in those groups.

Both the “Indonesian” and “white” groups are equally heterogeneous. But the labels they attract, for example, as “white,” “Indonesian,” or “international” depend on who is calling the shots. And although westernized, English-speaking students may be referred to as “white” by the students when speaking of status, the fact that they share a sense of familiarity with western culture becomes invisible to the teachers when internationalism is at stake.

Danau Tanu, PhD, is an anthropologist and the author of Growing Up in Transit: The Politics of Belonging at an International School, the first book on structural racism in international schools. Available now in hardback and eBook. The paperback edition will be available in December 2020; see for a 25% pre-order discount code. Portions of this article first appeared in Inside Indonesia.

Please fill out the form below if you would like to post a comment on this article:

Nickname (this will appear with your comments)


10/18/2020 - Kitty
Very interesting. Thank you for sharing.

After teaching drama and theater for more than 30 years in the international arena, Naima Thompson b ..more
Bobbi McDaniel became Director of the American International School of Monrovia in Liberia at the st ..more
As global educators, we want our students to be open-minded, culturally aware, and to appreciate and ..more
Masked Challenges of Language Learning
By Bonnie Billak
Field Testing Quality Virtual Learning Offline
By Elijah Petersen
Language Matters
By Jon Nordmeyer
When Students Actually Build on One Another’s Ideas
By Gordon Eldridge, TIE Columnist
Addressing Concerns About Student Screen Time
By Kim Marshall, TIE columnist
Teaching Remote Lessons in 25-Minute Chunks
By Kim Marshall, TIE columnist
The Top Three Things Teacher Leaders Should be Doing to Lead Remotely
By Bambi Betts & Kristen MacConnell
Why We Did Not Go Virtual
By Bambi Betts, Director, Principals’ Training Center
Saying is Believing: Why Names Matter
By Jon Nordmeyer, TIE columnist