Got it!
We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. More info

Already a subscriber or advertiser? Enter your login information here

Tuesday, 19 January 2021

FREE! Sign up for the TIE newsletter and never miss out on international school news, headlines, resources and best-practices from around the world!

06 January 2021 | When Educators Grieve
23 December 2020 | Welcome Back to Better
09 December 2020 | Confronting Place Ignorance
25 November 2020 | Joy and Enjoyment in Learning
11 November 2020 | The Weirdest Thing
28 October 2020 | TIE Is Transitioning Too
15 October 2020 | Rising to the Challenge

view more


Enter your email below to sign up:

Ready to subscribe and get all the features TIE has to offer? Click here >>


You are here: Home > Online Articles > Is Having a Growth Mindset Enough in Math? Introducing Mathematical Resilience



Is Having a Growth Mindset Enough in Math? Introducing Mathematical Resilience

By Priya Shah


Is Having a Growth Mindset Enough in Math? Introducing Mathematical Resilience

Action research for my M.Ed in Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) highlights that a Stanford University free online course “How to Learn Math: For Students” (Boaler, n.d.) makes a positive impact on the mathematical resilience (MR) of 32 high school students with an Individual Education Plan (IEP), as well as how math teachers view this student group. 

Growth mindset is the belief that ability can improve with time and effort (Dweck 2006).  Boaler et al. (2018) examined how the course impacts school students' engagement, mindset, and their academic achievement in math. The treatment group showed positive results on all the variables measured compared to the control group. Their sample was limited to middle school students in the United States. In contrast, Education Endowment Foundation (2019) shows that growth mindset may not be enough to help students’ progress in math. Their sample was limited to U.K. primary school students. I instantly became curious as to why growth mindset may not be enough.

My search for a standardized assessment that could measure growth mindset led to a concept called “mathematical resilience” that takes into consideration the affective viewpoint and not just beliefs (growth mindset). It is a four-part construct rooted in previous theories.

Kooken et al. (2016) developed the standardized Mathematical Resilience Scale (MRS) on U.S. university students, which measures three of the four aspects of MR:

  1. Value is how much students find value in studying math for whatever their present and future goals will be. Self-regulation plays a major role in the value attitude.

  2. The struggle scale gauges their belief that it is normal to experience challenges as well as difficulties while learning math for everyone (including experts).

  3. The growth scale refers to the belief that knowledge of math is malleable and that math ability can be improved by effort.                                      

Johnston-Wilder et al. (2016) assert: “A resilient stance towards mathematics can be engineered by a strategic and explicit focus on the culture of learning mathematics” (p3).                                              

They elaborate on creating a group culture of “can do” math in a safe environment with support (fourth aspect of MR) from anywhere—peers, online support, textbook, adults, etc. This reduces anxieties and builds knowledge of the non-cognitive domain of math learning. This disrupts negative beliefs, thoughts, and actions such as learned helplessness and avoidance of doing math.                                     

My hypothesis was that the course would support the development of all four aspects of MR, not just the growth aspect (rooted in the growth mindset concept). This research is important because it adds to the growing research on MR by being explicit about the intervention used to develop MR. Also, the international school overseas sample was different from the published research on growth mindset and on MR. A full 80 percent of students are third culture kids (TCKs)—that is, children of expatriates/diplomats moving from country to country every two years or so due to the nature of their parents’ jobs.  

It was predicted that their scores would be lower than the published research because of two barriers: their Special Educational Needs and gaps in math skills and knowledge due to their status as TCKs. However, this was not the case. The sample is comparably resilient to the normative sample, even before the online course and then improved after the course was completed.               

Thematic analysis (Braun & Clark 2013) of the key messages students gained from the course suggests that it does not only develop a growth mindset, but also the other aspects of MR that Johnston et al (2010) elaborated on—that is, value, struggle, and support.            

Yeager and Dweck (2012) assert that mindsets promote resilience, expounding that a mindset acts as a lens that filters a student’s experience of math challenges and leads to different patterns of coping. It does not even matter what a teacher perceives, according to them; what does matter is the students’ interpretation of the challenges faced, e.g., I need to work harder next time (opportunity to learn and grow—growth mindset); I am dumb in math (threatens ability and gets defensive—fixed mindset). This has a knock-on effect on a student’s goals, beliefs about effort, attributions for their setback, and learning strategies. This suggests that MR should be embedded in the math curriculum so that students can learn math effectively and joyfully.

I would recommend dialing in on peers and online support like the free Stanford course, given the current COVID-19 situation, by trialing and assessing distance/hybrid learning approaches that schools around the globe are implementing, e.g. using the standardized mathematical resilience scale.

Empathy for and openness to students with IEPs should have a knock-on effect to the students’ self-esteem based on an improved relationship with the teacher. The focus should be relationship building for the teacher so that other foundational components, like "value" can solidify while "struggle" and seeking “support” can be normalized to enhance the "growth" area of the student on mathematical knowledge/skills/standards.

For a full list of references and more details about my research, contact me on

Priya is a High School Learning Support Teacher at the International School of Kenya.

Please fill out the form below if you would like to post a comment on this article:

Nickname (this will appear with your comments)


There are currently no comments posted. Please post one via the form above.

Having coached over 30 women leaders in the past year as they’ve navigated the leadership search pro ..more
What classroom assessment practices will contribute most to understanding and improving student lear ..more
Restorative practice includes elements of collaboration, critical thinking, communication, character ..more
Change: The New Normal
By Shwetangna Chakrabarty, TIE blogger
Designing Curriculum for Global Citizenship
By Gordon Eldridge, TIE Columnist
Home Sweet Exile
By Bruce Gilbert
The Little Library Making a Big Difference
By Veenaa Agrawal
Reimagining Schools When We Return to a New Normal
By Kim Marshall, TIE columnist
Douglas Fisher and Nancy Frey on Effective Remote Instruction
By Kim Marshall, TIE columnist
The Top Three Things Teacher Leaders Should be Doing to Lead Remotely
By Bambi Betts & Kristen MacConnell
Why We Did Not Go Virtual
By Bambi Betts, Director, Principals’ Training Center