Got it!
We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies. More info

Already a subscriber or advertiser? Enter your login information here

Thursday, 6 August 2020

FREE! Sign up for the TIE newsletter and never miss out on international school news, headlines, resources and best-practices from around the world!

21 July 2020 | TIE Statement on Equity
19 June 2020 | Juneteenth & the June Issue
04 June 2020 | Black Lives Matter
22 May 2020 | Every Voice Counts
23 April 2020 | Believe in Books

  Enter your email below to sign up:

Ready to subscribe and get all the features TIE has to offer? Click here >>


INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL APPOINTMENTS

You are here: Home > Online Articles > How to Get a Job? Try the Google Treatment

TOP STORIES

SEARCH

How to Get a Job? Try the Google Treatment

By Tiffani Razavi, TIE Staff Writer

07/23/2014

If you want to find out about something, practically anything, chances are you will google it. So it should come as no surprise that if you want to know about how your students are going to get jobs in the future, you need only look as far as Google.

As recently reported in The New York Times, Laszlo Bock, Senior Vice President of People Operations at Google, is quick to make it clear that good grades from good higher education institutions are not enough, and sometimes may not even be necessary. He is dismissive about the predictive value of GPAs and test scores generally, although he readily admits that specific skills in mathematics, computing, and coding are needed for technical roles and that an applicant with such proven skills would have an edge.

Mr. Bock’s views are hardly unexpected. Good grades have always been a kind of shorthand for employers, an indicator of skills and abilities, and nothing has changed there. What has changed is that the skills and abilities represented by good grades are becoming less and less relevant to today’s computerized organizations.

As columnist David Brooks noted recently, also in the Times, as computers become more present in the workplace, mental skills such as a great memory, collecting and regurgitating information (as for a test), and following rules will naturally become less valued.
In environments where computers and machines calculate and monitor, it is the uniquely human skills that are most needed, such as “the voracious lust for understanding,” “the enthusiasm for work,” and “the ability to grasp the gist.”

Cue Mr. Bock.

At the top of the list of what Google looks for in prospective employees is what Mr. Bock calls general cognitive ability. “It is not IQ,” he says, “it is learning ability. It is the ability to process on the fly. It is the ability to pull together disparate bits of information.”

He goes on to highlight “emergent leadership”—not whether you were the president of something at some point, but how, as a team member, you lead when you are needed and step back when you are not. He links this ability with the qualities of humility and a sense of responsibility. A person needs to take responsibility for the work, without dominating or micromanaging.

With humility, a person can relinquish control and allow others to step in when appropriate. Perhaps even more importantly, having intellectual humility means that a person can be open to real learning. Ironically, good grades from top institutions can sometimes signal an inability to acknowledge and build on mistakes.

Mr. Bock notes that “successful, bright people rarely experience failure, and so they do not learn how to learn from that failure.”

And at the bottom of Mr. Bock’s list is... expertise. If the other strengths are there, they more than compensate for lack of expertise. Sure, an expert can quickly come up with a standard solution to a problem, but most of the time a non-expert will get to the same solution, and sometimes a new and better one. According to Mr. Bock, the risk of the non-expert’s occasional error far outweighs the potential benefits of totally new answers.

Teachers everywhere need to be alive to the reality of the kind of workplace they are preparing their students to enter, and that the learning mindset they foster could be the key to a successful career. Those fortunate to be in an international school setting may already have an edge—if they choose to draw on the special features of their social environment.
In his 2012 book, Opening Minds, Peter Johnston points out that many of us have been schooled to value facts and certainty, leading to a view of knowledge as fixed, which holds us back from participating in the active generation of knowledge. Fact is fact; there is no reason to question or explore.

Acknowledging that events, discoveries, theories, and scientific evidence can be viewed differently according to a range of contexts and perspectives, including personal, social, economic, political, and cultural—an approach that typically characterizes an international school curriculum—reinforces a view of knowledge in which new understanding is always possible.

Exposed to the influence of more than one culture, international school students are likely to learn to accept, and even value, uncertainty as an opportunity for discovery.

The international experience can also encourage students to develop a humble attitude towards their own opinions, as they learn the value of access to multiple viewpoints and grow accustomed to having their own views challenged.

At the same time, clear, honest, and respectful expression of thoughts is emphasized as an essential part of collective learning. Students who are used to engaging in conversations about a wide range of topics and expect to hear diverse opinions are likely to be more open to consider new information and change their minds.

Familiarity with teachers and students of varied backgrounds also helps young people to adopt a dynamic view of knowledge, in which new perspectives are valued as a means to fuller understanding, better answers, and more effective solutions. The opportunity to enjoy interacting with people whose opinions are different from their own gives international school students a tendency to understand the perspective of both sides in conflict situations, and to seek diverse views when looking for a solution to a problem, laying a foundation for openness to collaborative work and learning.

Sounds just right for Google.




Please fill out the form below if you would like to post a comment on this article:

Nickname (this will appear with your comments)
Email
Comments


Comments

There are currently no comments posted. Please post one via the form above.

MORE FROM TOP STORIES
We might be raising the first generation of children who truly understand the value of school and ap ..more
No longer is there a chance to kneel beside a child, smile from across the room, or nudge with clear ..more
The international school where I am employed issued a statement, “The Responsibility of an Internati ..more
COLLEGE COUNSELING WITH MARTIN WALSH
COVID19
Adopting a Future-as-Present Frame of Mind
By Emily Sargent-Beasley
15-Jul-20
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION
GORDON ELDRIDGE: LESSONS IN LEARNING
When Students Actually Build on One Another’s Ideas
By Gordon Eldridge, TIE Columnist
15-Jul-20
What Do We Know About Self-Assessment?
By Gordon Eldridge, TIE Columnist
26-Mar-20
IN THE SPOTLIGHT
A Life-Changing Pandemic
By Rahaf Ala’aldin Yousef Mishael, Grade 8
18-Jun-20
THE MARSHALL MEMO
Encouraging Kindergarten Play During Remote Learning
By Kim Marshall, TIE columnist
15-Jul-20
Psychological Factors That Perpetuate Racism and Can Be Changed
By Kim Marshall, TIE columnist
18-Jun-20
THE PRINCIPALS' TRAINING CENTER
The Top Three Things Teacher Leaders Should be Doing to Lead Remotely
By Bambi Betts & Kristen MacConnell
27-Jun-20
Why We Did Not Go Virtual
By Bambi Betts, Director, Principals’ Training Center
22-May-20